Відео

Class consciousness!

Thank you for making this video, Love from India. 🙏

"If you only know how to DO things, you'll look at certain circumstances and say "I don't know how to do that" Rather if you know who you are, then you know how to be and then you're BEING will call upon you to invite you to the particular doing in the moment" WOW

💙

Presentation starts at 8:05

💙

I am not really concerned about what any particular person BELIEVES. You may believe that there is an old man with a white beard perched in the clouds, that the Ultimate Reality is a young blackish-blue Indian guy, that the universe is eternal, that Mother Mary was a certifiable virgin or that gross physical matter is the foundation of existence. The ONLY thing that really matters is your meta-ethics, not your meta-physics. Do you consider any form of non-monarchical government (such as democracy or socialism) to be beneficial? Do you unnecessarily destroy the lives of poor, innocent animals and gorge on their bloody carcasses? Do you believe homosexuality and transvestism is moral? Do you consider feminist ideology to be righteous? If so, then you are objectively immoral and your so-called "enlightened/awakened" state is immaterial, since it does not benefit society in any way.

HOMOSEXUAL acts are legitimate solely within polygamous marriages, as defined in Chapter 27 of this “Final Instruction Sheet for Humanity” (“F.I.S.H”). Read Chapter 12 and the Glossary entry under “slippery slope”, to learn the reason for homosexuality being detrimental to society, and therefore, other homosexual acts being unlawful. Whereas heterosexual unions are normal, natural, and necessary for a prosperous society, homosexuality is abnormal, unnatural, and unnecessary, and is destructive to individuals, to families, to society, and of course, to the very survival of the Homo sapiens species itself. Leading neuroscientists of the current century have demonstrated that same-sex attraction and gender dysphoria can be attributed to certain parts of the brain being formed similarly to the person’s (biological) gender OPPOSITE. There are other physiological determinants for homosexual attraction, such as genetic and hormonal, and to a far lesser degree, environmental causes. As demonstrated in Chapter 11, this phenomenon was preordained in eternity, but so too were all unbeneficial traits such as criminality and addictive personality disorders, and does not negate the obvious requirement for society to punish perpetrators of homosexual acts. Again, read Chapter 12 to understand metaethics, applied ethics, and the reason for homosexual unions being objectively evil by nature. Of all the concepts put forward in this Holiest of Holy Scriptures, this condemnation of homosexual acts is, perhaps, the teaching that elicits the most vitriolic responses from individuals, because over the past few decades of writing this treatise, homosexuality has become widely acceptable within most societies throughout the world, and even glorified in some cases! However, the obvious fact of its pernicious nature MUST be proclaimed if human society is to endure and prosper. It ought to be emphasized that homosexual acts themselves are unlawful, and not simply being predisposed to same-sex attraction. In other words, homosexual individuals can not be prosecuted simply for being attracted to members of the same gender, but only for engaging in unlawful sexual acts such as sodomy, just as heterosexuals should not be punished merely for being attracted to members of the opposite sex, but for fornicating with them (that is, engaging in extra-marital sexual activity). It may be misconstrued that a slippery slope argument is being made in regards to homosexual acts, but if one critically scrutinizes the relevant passage, that is not at all what is being posited. Even a single act of homosexual behaviour is necessarily evil. The only possible exception to this rule is in the case of same-sex acts within a polygamous marriage (as defined in Chapter 27 of this Holy Scripture), and in such a marriage, morally-permissible only whilst the husband is collectively-engaged in sex acts with his wives. What is NOT fallacious, is to compare the state of affairs at either extreme of the sexual dichotomy, to discern the outcomes if either practice was to be taken to their ultimate conclusions. Thus, if every competent, heterosexual adult was to marry (and obviously, by “marry”, I am here referring to actual marriage, as defined in Chapter 27, and not to any other notion of marriage as conceived by a large proportion of the populace, particularly the leftists who seem to dominate public life in most all Western and Westernized countries), it would be objectively-moral, since every heterosexual man would be able to gratify his inordinately-voracious libido in a legitimate and non-harmful fashion, every heterosexual woman would be able to satisfy her romantic and sexual needs, and the union would usually result in progeny, which would not only benefit the parents, but also assure the continuation of the species. On the other hand, if every adult was to engage in a homosexual relationship, it would be objectively-immoral, because, apart from the psychological harm (and physiological injury, in the case of male homosexuals) it would cause each and every individual, it would obviously lead to the consummate destruction of human society and the extinction of humanity. So, just as a single cancerous cell degrades a person’s body to a miniscule degree, even a single extramarital homosexual act debases human society, even if it is to a very small extent. Therefore, the so-called ‘slippery-slope’ argument is superfluous to any of my moral proclamations. N.B. In case one may believe that the reason for this author being opposed to homosexuality (more specifically, homosexual acts) is due to the fact that I, the author, am wholly heterosexual and simply hold an instinctive hatred for homosexuals, the following should be noted: Firstly, as already explained in more than a couple of passages of “FISH”, there is a highly-rational basis for denouncing homosexual acts. Secondly, I fully understand that I could easily have been born with the genes which govern same-sex attraction, or could have been conditioned by parents, friends, teachers, and society to have homosexual inclinations. If that were the case, I would simply do what I am now doing - living a chaste life, since BOTH homosexual acts and heterosexual acts without marriage are, by definition, immoral, and in the case of penetrative acts, worthy of the death penalty. So, the reader is assured that I have absolutely no animosity whatsoever towards anybody born with homosexual tendencies. After all, an enormous percentage (I would say most) of the population is bisexual to a certain degree. Yet, to act on same-sex desires is very detrimental to individuals and to society as a whole, and homosexual offenders must be appropriately punished by an authority.

HOMOSEXUAL acts are legitimate solely within polygamous marriages, as defined in Chapter 27 of this “Final Instruction Sheet for Humanity” (“F.I.S.H”). Read Chapter 12 and the Glossary entry under “slippery slope”, to learn the reason for homosexuality being detrimental to society, and therefore, other homosexual acts being unlawful. Whereas heterosexual unions are normal, natural, and necessary for a prosperous society, homosexuality is abnormal, unnatural, and unnecessary, and is destructive to individuals, to families, to society, and of course, to the very survival of the Homo sapiens species itself. Leading neuroscientists of the current century have demonstrated that same-sex attraction and gender dysphoria can be attributed to certain parts of the brain being formed similarly to the person’s (biological) gender OPPOSITE. There are other physiological determinants for homosexual attraction, such as genetic and hormonal, and to a far lesser degree, environmental causes. As demonstrated in Chapter 11, this phenomenon was preordained in eternity, but so too were all unbeneficial traits such as criminality and addictive personality disorders, and does not negate the obvious requirement for society to punish perpetrators of homosexual acts. Again, read Chapter 12 to understand metaethics, applied ethics, and the reason for homosexual unions being objectively evil by nature. Of all the concepts put forward in this Holiest of Holy Scriptures, this condemnation of homosexual acts is, perhaps, the teaching that elicits the most vitriolic responses from individuals, because over the past few decades of writing this treatise, homosexuality has become widely acceptable within most societies throughout the world, and even glorified in some cases! However, the obvious fact of its pernicious nature MUST be proclaimed if human society is to endure and prosper. It ought to be emphasized that homosexual acts themselves are unlawful, and not simply being predisposed to same-sex attraction. In other words, homosexual individuals can not be prosecuted simply for being attracted to members of the same gender, but only for engaging in unlawful sexual acts such as sodomy, just as heterosexuals should not be punished merely for being attracted to members of the opposite sex, but for fornicating with them (that is, engaging in extra-marital sexual activity). It may be misconstrued that a slippery slope argument is being made in regards to homosexual acts, but if one critically scrutinizes the relevant passage, that is not at all what is being posited. Even a single act of homosexual behaviour is necessarily evil. The only possible exception to this rule is in the case of same-sex acts within a polygamous marriage (as defined in Chapter 27 of this Holy Scripture), and in such a marriage, morally-permissible only whilst the husband is collectively-engaged in sex acts with his wives. What is NOT fallacious, is to compare the state of affairs at either extreme of the sexual dichotomy, to discern the outcomes if either practice was to be taken to their ultimate conclusions. Thus, if every competent, heterosexual adult was to marry (and obviously, by “marry”, I am here referring to actual marriage, as defined in Chapter 27, and not to any other notion of marriage as conceived by a large proportion of the populace, particularly the leftists who seem to dominate public life in most all Western and Westernized countries), it would be objectively-moral, since every heterosexual man would be able to gratify his inordinately-voracious libido in a legitimate and non-harmful fashion, every heterosexual woman would be able to satisfy her romantic and sexual needs, and the union would usually result in progeny, which would not only benefit the parents, but also assure the continuation of the species. On the other hand, if every adult was to engage in a homosexual relationship, it would be objectively-immoral, because, apart from the psychological harm (and physiological injury, in the case of male homosexuals) it would cause each and every individual, it would obviously lead to the consummate destruction of human society and the extinction of humanity. So, just as a single cancerous cell degrades a person’s body to a miniscule degree, even a single extramarital homosexual act debases human society, even if it is to a very small extent. Therefore, the so-called ‘slippery-slope’ argument is superfluous to any of my moral proclamations. N.B. In case one may believe that the reason for this author being opposed to homosexuality (more specifically, homosexual acts) is due to the fact that I, the author, am wholly heterosexual and simply hold an instinctive hatred for homosexuals, the following should be noted: Firstly, as already explained in more than a couple of passages of “FISH”, there is a highly-rational basis for denouncing homosexual acts. Secondly, I fully understand that I could easily have been born with the genes which govern same-sex attraction, or could have been conditioned by parents, friends, teachers, and society to have homosexual inclinations. If that were the case, I would simply do what I am now doing - living a chaste life, since BOTH homosexual acts and heterosexual acts without marriage are, by definition, immoral, and in the case of penetrative acts, worthy of the death penalty. So, the reader is assured that I have absolutely no animosity whatsoever towards anybody born with homosexual tendencies. After all, an enormous percentage (I would say most) of the population is bisexual to a certain degree. Yet, to act on same-sex desires is very detrimental to individuals and to society as a whole, and homosexual offenders must be appropriately punished by an authority.

God Bless your organization ❤

Garbage ideology

Is this wokeness theology? The changes happen always on all parties. But why some parties earn dominant positions over the time because of great merits other parties should learn. Every party to adapt for the best of new whole, but not necessarily equally.

Paul Gorrell on the practice of forgiveness is Good. OF course Dr Volf is a good help to me (thx also to Tim Keller). HEY Tech guy - good job.

Greetings from Mexico and thanks for sharing the knowledge you have acquired.

Still waiting for a non native wheelchair person to factcheck this bullshit .... Researchs they are nice but seems like this one hasn't been done with integrity dont eat stuff that smell like poisons Kings

,. 💩💩💩🙅🇱🇷🇺🇸🇹🇦🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇬🇧🇬🇧

definitely helped me understand racial project! Thanks, now I can write my essay :)

This is excellent advice for organizations beyond the specific religious institutions to which he speaks.

Thank you so much for making this resource available.😃

Thank you for doing this for young people around the world! <3

Great thoughts. Paul experienced a shipwreck but his faith survived whereas many young people (and everyone else) suffer shipwreck and their faith with it. How does a young person's faith survive the shipwreck?

Legendary course

Great presentation. Really helpful and hopeful.

This video is GOLD for those who want to become a friend of Jesus, like Brother Lawrence did.

Lol the history of complaining for your own personal failure.

Very good. Thanks

Thank you 👍

It is completely true that we are all made in God's image and need to treat each other as such with God's love pouring through us for each other. This is why it was the "white" western world that struggled with their perception of slavery not matching up with their religion as opposed to other religions that don't preach Christ's love. Slavery has been around for thousands of years not just the 500 or 600 mentioned in this video. It took awhile, but as European "Christian" culture wrestled with Christ's love the European countries based on a moral "Christian law" came to see slavery was wrong. These same white countries, namely Britain and America, fought to end slavery not only in their own countries but all around the world. The "white" countries pretty much bullied Brazil, Africa, and the middle east to outlaw slavery. And the slavery in these latter places ended much much later than the slavery here in America. You said that our colonization was based on slavery which is not accurate as most colonial people had no slaves. You also fail to admit that it was the Christian faith working in the European "white countries" to end slavery. If you are going to specify how evil we are because we once embraced the world-wide accepted practice of slavery it is only right and fair that you highlight our role in ending slavery as well.

For those who never heard an for those who wanna share it. HERE IS THE MILLMILLION-DOLLA. QUESTION: Will you go to Heaven when you die? Here’s a quick test: Have you ever lied, stolen, or used God’s name in vain? Jesus said, “Whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.” If you have done these things, God sees you as a lying, thieving, blasphemous, adulterer at heart, and the Bible warns that one day God will punish you in a terrible place called Hell. But God is not willing that any should perish. Sinners broke God’s Law and Jesus paid their fine. This means that God can legally dismiss their case: “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.” Then Jesus rose from the dead, defeating death. Today, repent and trust Jesus, and God will give you eternal life as a free gift. Then read the Bible daily and obey it. God will never fail you.. ...

ua-cam.com/video/8u9klwBKlss/v-deo.html

Great talk. Here is another resource ua-cam.com/video/C8IucUy7PE8/v-deo.html white supremacy in evangelicism

RACE & RACISM IS A FRAUD! Only a tool of evil used to divide the weak and vulnerable Two kinds of people cries RACISM. Those who profit from it, and those who are controlled led to believe they are VICTIMS of it. It is all a scam! . ua-cam.com/video/mvdXALGMmk0/v-deo.html.

Nice one, keep uploading! Have you checked followsm . c o m!? It’s the best way to promote your channel!!

This woman actually thinks she's helping young people. Just a deluded fundie.

Hi there, are the lectures by Drs Smith and Bennett available online? Would love to hear what they have to say! :)

Good news, Lillian. We "Nones" are banding together to learn how to minister to complete morons. So hold on. There is hope for you.

You're not convincing and you're not reaching any "nones". You only convince me you're a couple of delusional fundie whackjobs.

Church people talking to church people about church. You all have nothing to offer us skeptics on the fence. I don't intend that in a mean way - I've been trying to help my former church look at these issues. No one wants to face it, they don't care about the future - they don't care if they're the last generation. They don't want to change and they don't want to devote their money to other groups outside their small minded tribe. When the last one of them dies, they can tear the big building down as far as they care.

Can you add an option of automatic english subtitles?

Great video ! I have shared your video on dizivizi by tagging it on, yale university Help people to find your videos and channel. Tag your videos to their locations at Dizivizi.com for free and get more views. dizivizi.com/video/248336/wes-ellis-friendship-joy-285-prospect-st-new-haven-ct-06511-usa.html

Great video ! I have shared your video on dizivizi by tagging it on, yale university Help people to find your videos and channel. Tag your videos to their locations at Dizivizi.com for free and get more views. dizivizi.com/video/248334/dr-kenda-creasy-dean-wes-ellis-joy-untamed-friendship-jw-gibbs-lab-260-whitney-ave-new-haven-ct-06511-usa.html

www.claimyourcampus.com